VHS Viewer for AXIS

Posted on by

VHS Viewer for Axis is an App for the iPhone that connects you to the AXIS® VHS (Video Hosting Service).
This means you can access footage recorded by your AXIS® Network Camera remotely from your iPhone.
VHS Viewer for Axis is targeted directly at the security market.
Functions include browsing the archive recordings, play rewind & fast-foward, snapshot and much more.
Full details here: http://www.eyespyfx.com/vhs/index.htm
Read more about Axis here: http://www.eyespyfx.com/blog/?p=339

The Internet of Things, Apps and a Design Challenge

Posted on by

The Internet of Things is a term used for an idea (Google it, perhaps its not an idea it is a meme) where the internet has been extended into the world of objects. A network of objects – such as household appliances is envisaged in a self configuring wireless network. Every object – a kettle, a fridge, a chair, a hairbrush has an IP address and an Operating System. It is possible to buy an App for a fridge. “Beer Chiller” may quickly chill a beer while “Fat Alarm” may sound an Alert when you reach for Oven Ready Chips. Whatever!

The Internet of Things idea/meme builds on existing technologies and draws on them to fortify its sense of achievability. Here are some of the basic building blocks:

  • The idea of Apps for the Internet of Things builds on the existing model of Apps for phones.
  • Self finding networking protocols such as Bonjour perhaps could serve as a model of aspects of the network for the Internet of things.
  • Network aware devices already exist in the form of network cameras. Java, Linux, OSX, Android all could contribute to a small device OS.
  • Other technical elements that could form the back bone of the Internet of things are Open Source, API’s, Mash ups, Multimodal Multimedia, Embedded web access in small devices.
  • The Internet of things maps onto the idea of the cloud being the where the computing power is and the viewing terminals being lighter machines. Kevin Kelly in his TED presentation the next 5000 days of the internet says that “there is only one machine, the web is its OS, all screens look into the one, no bits will live outside the web, to share is to gain, let the one read it”. Kelly makes it sound a little apocalyptic but actually the cloud and thin client architecture is already in place and accepted in the form of “netbooks”, “kindles” “psp’s”, phones.
  • Finally of course the idea of the “smart home” has been around for decades but its development and spread has been thwarted by multiple proprietary systems lack of compatibility and extensibility.

The challenge ahead for the Internet of things certainly has many technical elements but they are not the reason why the idea has not to date taken hold. The first challenge is one of design and imagination.  The fact is that it’s a bit hard to think up things to do with the internet of things. When telephones were invented in 1870’s and the World Wide Web in the 1980’s few people could think of a widespread use for them.

It seems likely that the first wave of the Internet of things will take place around home entertainment. Already we see hooked up devices and software in iPODs, Game Consoles, TVs, Music players, Social networking. People are beginning to expect (but don’t always get) portability and compatibility between one home entertainment device and another. Expectations are also rising with regard to plugging into social networking sites. Play lists from Spotify can be shared on Facebook and played on another device in another home. Slowly, steadily, imperfectly the Internet of things is taking hold. Cooking recipes and celebrity chefs may be the source of further development (not yet seen) in the internet of things. Cooking apps in the fridge, the cooker, the press and the kitchen sink could potentially integrate with celebrity recipe apps on social networking sites accessed via phones, media frames or tablets located in the kitchen. The idea of Jamie’s fridge app does not seem particularly far fetched. Could cooking a meal be given a social reality TV twist with kitchen netcams uploading images and data streams from the users kitchen appliances?

So what is needed to make the Internet of Things happen? “Build it and they will come”. Apple have shown with the app store that if an environment is built where everyone can make money then everyone will come.

1. Compelling use cases need to be created by designers and authors.

2. Appliance manufacturers need to start putting computer systems into appliances.

3. An appliance manufacturing company needs to create an open platform that allows developers to create control apps for its range of appliances.

4. Developers need to create apps for the devices.

Axis Partner

Posted on by

EyeSpyFX are pleased to announce that we are now an Axis Development Partner. We originally joined Axis Development programme in 2003 and have recently begun a deeper level of collaboration with Axis. Becoming an Axis Development Partner is a reflection on this work.

logo_axis_adp_250

The TomTom Garmin Android story.

Posted on by

Turn by Turn Navigation GPS devices for cars have been the main business for GPS companies such as TomTom and Garmin for several years. Both companies realised that having a GPS device in your car (a popular christmas present two years ago) and a also owning a large screen mobile device was a bit of a duplication. So they made App versions of their turn by turn products. TomTom sells its Turn by Turn UK and Ireland app on the iPhone app store for £59.99.

And so everything was happy in the GPS company garden.

But then:

Google released a turn by turn app for

FREE

On Google Android devices!

This is what has happened to share prices:

bamgoogled

Bamgoogled?

How big is the world market for apps?

Posted on by

Surprise: lets start with Apple. Estimates vary about how much in dollars of apps have been purchased via the app store. I read somewhere that Apple sold $300m in the first year of operation of the app store. And I read somewhere else that Apple is now selling $200m of apps per month.

Looking next at device Market share in a say for example a basket of countries in Western Europe the market share by brand may look something like this:

Nokia                           22%

Samsung                     20%

Sony Ericsson             19%

Other Java phones     15%

Blackberry                  12%

Apple                           10%

Win Mob,  and rest      2%

If you say that Apple managed sales of $300 apps with just 10% of the device market share then it follows that if the other manufacturers managed to launch successful app stores and sold roughly the same amount of apps there would be a market for $300m x 10 = $3B per annum.

Peak Apps = $3B per annum?

3 Reasons why this figure is too high.

  1. It does not necessarily follow that simply because people buy apps on the apple app store that they will do so using other devices on other App Stores. Other app stores existed long before Apple started theirs but no one (except Apple) noticed. App sales before Apple were small.
  2. Everyone might get bored and stop buying apps. You may have seen reports stating that the average customer uses an App for about 1 minute. (How did they figure that out?)
  3. A technological advance may occur that wipes out the App economy.

3 Reasons why this figure is too low

  1. Apple don’t sell in India or China. If they did the figure could mushroom.
  2. The calculation is based on the relatively low reported sales in Apple first year of App sales (July 08 July 09). A more realistic start point might be current reported monthly sales multiplied by 12.
  3. The Internet of Things! It could be that the App store is an early prototype for selling apps for your fridge, cooker, heating system, chair in a world driven by the Internet of Things. Is it a phone, is it a computer, is it a camera, is it a pair of glasses, is it a fridge, is it a lamp? No! Its the internet of things! Could there be an App for that?